The Bellini Madonna: An art history mystery. In theory I should have enjoyed it, but the main character was unlikeable and not very believable and the plot kind of went nowhere. Meh.
Headlong: Another art history mystery. I liked all the info about Bruegel (the Elder) (in case you were wondering), but just wasn’t caught up at all in the ridiculous scheme to procure the painting, and again, the main character came off as a bit of a self-absorbed twat. More meh.
The Devil of Nanking: Creepy. Compelling. Atmospheric. Some of the images are still stuck in my head, giving me the heebs. I will be reading much more Mo Hayder.
Crime and Punishment: I’m starting to really ‘get’ the genius of Dostoyevski. But I often feel a strong desire to shout “Can everyone just CALM THE FUCK DOWN here?”
The Best Novels of Nancy Mitford: Charming, in the very best sense of the word. Kind of ‘P.G. Wodehouse meets Fay Weldon’. I wish Uncle Matthew was my dad.
Hungry Hill: Good ol’ Daphne du Maurier! ‘Nuff said.
Party of One: Finally, someone stands up for the loners in the world. I feel vindicated in my strange solitary habits. The language was a bit strident, though.
Dracula: See, I can stand a goodly portion of cheesy Victorian melodrama. But by the end of this I was totally on Dracula’s side and wished he would eat the heroes just to SHUT THEM THE HELL UP. And the erotic bits, with their misogynistic virgin/whore subtext, made me feel squicky.
M.R. James – Collected Ghost Stories: Brilliant! I love the utter, utter Englishness of these stories. The most bone-chilling of scenarios is met with cool unflappability and a cup of tea. “I was beginning to doubt the soundness of either my senses or my mind.”
Seven Pillars of Wisdom: I’m still reading this – it’s slow going. What a strange and fascinating character T.E. Lawrence was. I do enjoy how he takes care to explain within the first five pages that occasionally during the campaign the young men sought solace in each other’s bodies, but that this was only the pure, natural outlet of their virile youthful energy. Hey man, nobody’s judging! What happens in the sand dunes stays in the sand dunes, right?*
The Famished Road: I put this down without finishing it, and that is extremely rare for me. Especially with a Booker Prize winner. It was beautifully written, and I liked the hallucinatory feel – sort of like an African Angela Carter – but…I don’t know. There wasn’t enough narrative thrust, or something. It seemed to be the same thing over and over: boy goes to Madame Koto’s bar. Sees some weird one-eyed midget or something who is really a spirit. Runs away into the forest. More spirits. Runs home. Dad is drunk on palm wine and shouting a lot. Repeat.
I Know This Much is True: Engaging, with an appealingly simple style. A few too many extraordinary Dickensian coincidences, though, and the ending was overly neat.
*Has anyone else clocked the use of the grammatically suspect phrase “What goes on tour stays on tour?” This drives me nutso. It should be “What happens on tour stays on tour.” Otherwise you are saying that someone who goes on tour will not come back. (Of course, this is a phrase most often uttered by brainless, beer-bonging frat goons, and their abuses of the English language are generally a minor element in their overall offensiveness.)
























